but also afford a new way for signification and transformation as a result of the literary
structure and also in the artist's subject. Meaning that based on preexisting
structures and norms formed does not work only by changing
the accepted principles, a new way to introduce significant. Kristeva
recognizes the transformative nature of the avant-garde poets and in a
symbolic and pre-accepted system. She generally considered innovative
and creative elements in a work of literature, of reproductive text or
character language, change the direction of the speaking subject and the
capacity to play and enjoy virgin suggest that coercion and general
requirements symbolic law and violated the concept of "border" as well
as the violation, or violation of the border face with it. Therefore, this
"practice" can accept both the symbolic and, in front of the law to
restore it. Something that can find examples of it in various forms of
literature and art based on the theory of literature outlining the terms of
Kristeva. But such a theory can be found in various dimensions and
aesthetics beyond the usual form for literature and art beyond the realm
of an aesthetic object attribute, which could lead to the transformation
of the subject and culture.
